Rezoomex’s Moonlighting & Remote Work Debate!

Pune, June 29 – Rezoomex, a leading organization in the IT industry, recently organized a thought-provoking debate on the topic of ethical moonlighting and its possibilities. The two-hour long event witnessed the participation of 55 eminent professionals, including CEOs and leaders, who shared their insights and perspectives on the matter. 

During the engaging debate, 75% of the attendees expressed their support for ethical moonlighting, highlighting its potential benefits. However, there were varying opinions on how moonlighting should be approached and regulated. The participants shed light on several aspects and considerations that revolve around engaging in moonlighting activities. 

Mr. Vinayak Joglekar, Founder Director of Rezoomex, emphasized his support for ethical moonlighting when carried out with the prior approval of the primary employer. He pointed out that professionals have been undertaking external projects even before the term “moonlighting” gained popularity. Mr. Joglekar highlighted how highly paid and highly qualified consultants have always shared their time with multiple clients, showcasing the possibility of ethical moonlighting. 

Akash Malve, Global Head of Data Science & AI at Exela Technologies, supported moonlighting when conducted within a defined framework based on Competition, Contracts, Competency, and Conflict. He stressed the importance of proper management and adherence to ethical guidelines to ensure a positive moonlighting experience. 

Jay Pathak, Angular Architect at Etrade Menlopark, shared his personal experience where hiring a candidate with rare skills proved challenging. He expressed his support for moonlighting as it enabled him to complete his project within the required timeframe. Mr. Pathak believes that moonlighting can be a valuable solution for accessing specialized skills that may not be readily available for full-time hiring. 

Aniruddha Paranjape, CEO of Kanaka Software, endorsed moonlighting due to its potential for individuals to acquire rare skills that may be unavailable through traditional hiring methods. As long as work is delivered punctually and customers are satisfied, Mr. Paranjape supports moonlighting within boundaries that do not conflict with the organization’s interests. 

Johnson Abraham, Principal Software Engineering Manager at Cloudreach, highlighted the positive aspects of moonlighting, including the development of qualities such as autonomy, time management, confidence, and a sense of ownership. He emphasized how moonlighting can contribute to personal and professional growth, as well as upskilling. 

Harish Rohokale, Founder & CEO of Apptware & Appmart, expressed his concerns about moonlighting, citing client code confidentiality, productivity issues, and security as potential drawbacks. He implemented a model within his company that allows team members to earn and learn through in-house projects, providing an alternative to moonlighting. 

Ronak Patil, Founding Technical Engineer at Cast.AI, generally agreed with moonlighting within a defined framework. He highlighted the additional financial incentive it offers, especially for juniors with lower salaries who face challenges in expensive cities like Pune and Bangalore. Mr. Patil suggested that moonlighting can serve as a viable option for individuals seeking additional income. 

Manish Agrawal, Co-founder & CTO of Yagna IQ Inc, opposed moonlighting, stating that knowledge workers’ responsibilities often extend beyond regular working hours, particularly in product companies. He raised concerns about the potential negative impact on family time, sleep, and concentration on the primary job. Mr. Agrawal recommended individuals to explore freelancing or consulting as alternatives. 

Shreya Thombre, Project Manager (PMO) at IBM, also voiced her opposition to moonlighting, placing a high value on loyalty to the primary employer. She emphasized the significant risks associated with conflicts of interest and data privacy that can arise from allowing moonlighting activities. 

Pratap Shrotriya, CEO of SplendorNet Technologies, presented perspectives from both employers and employees. From an employee’s perspective, he highlighted the importance of satisfaction over monetary reasons. Mr. Shrotriya stated that engaging in multiple activities may prevent individuals from finding time for themselves and their families. As an employer, he expressed the company’s preference for employees to focus on their primary work and conserve their energy rather than engaging in moonlighting activities. 

Kiran Ratnakar, Director of Cybersecurity, Cloud, Encora, shared his experience of moonlighting with prior approval from the CTO. He acknowledged the potential benefits of additional knowledge gained from moonlighting that can be useful to the current company. However, Mr. Ratnakar cautioned about the risks associated with intellectual property protection and insider threats, emphasizing the need for certain constraints on moonlighting activities. 

Salil Khedkar, Head of Software Engineering at Microlise, adopted a neutral standpoint. While supporting ethical moonlighting for building a talented and thriving team, he stressed the importance of addressing productivity and work-life balance issues. Mr. Khedkar recommended allowing moonlighting activities with proper guidelines and regulations. 

The debate also brought to light the reasons why individuals consider moonlighting, including underutilization of capabilities and idle time. Employees emphasized the need for companies to value their output and focus on outcomes rather than measuring time spent or filling time sheets. However, a discrepancy arises as companies often charge clients based on the time and material model, leading to a mismatch in expectations. 

A unique proposal was discussed during the event, suggesting the development of an NFT system to lock in the identity of employees engaging in moonlighting. Additionally, a three-way smart contract was proposed to ensure that both companies simultaneously working with the employees can receive the appropriate share of their time and attention. 

Overall, the debate on ethical moonlighting organized by Rezoomex received a positive response and facilitated a healthy exchange of ideas. Rezoomex extends its gratitude to all the participants for their valuable time and contributions. The organization expresses its intention to organize further events on this topic in the near future. 

For media inquiries, please contact: 

Vinayak Joglekar 

Founder Director 



Hope this article was helpful to you. If yes, we will be glad if you could share it with your connections online. You can also tweet your comments to @rezoomex and @akshaymoon89 with #TechHiringBlog

Remote hiring opens up new opportunities for IT employees & companies post Covid-19



Initially we weren’t happy being forced to work from home for months. But, now that it has become the new normal, most of us would hate to give up our ability to control location or working hours. There are advantages and disadvantages. First let’s take a  look at the advantages.

Continue reading “Remote hiring opens up new opportunities for IT employees & companies post Covid-19”

Remote Hiring – A Paradigm Shift


Remote Hiring

Covid-19 pandemic has pushed many companies beyond the tipping point to adopt remote working as the new normal. Remote working is quite easy and natural for the knowledge workers – especially those working in the field of software development. This article focuses on how remote working has impacted hiring software engineers and the demands that it puts on the hiring tool being used by the companies.

Continue reading “Remote Hiring – A Paradigm Shift”

Life after CoronaVirus



“Yes the storm will pass, humankind will survive, most of us will still be alive – but we will inhabit a different world. ” – Yuval Noah Harari

“Coronavirus will change the world permanently.” – The Politico Magazine

After reading these articles I had my own thoughts – these are random as thoughts often are!

Many experts including Bill Gates have been warning us.

Continue reading “Life after CoronaVirus”

AI spells better times ahead for the subject matter experts


It is commonly believed that AI will empower the employees who are willing to learn – others will find it hard to keep their jobs. But there’s an even bigger opportunity for the subject matter experts. They will not only learn the changes being brought about by AI , but permanently enrich their jobs by becoming the trainers and administrators of the AI apps.

Continue reading “AI spells better times ahead for the subject matter experts”

IT Hiring as Seen by Interviewers/Hiring Managers: Part 2


In this part, we will propose a solution to the problems perceived by the hiring managers as concluded in part 1 of this article. Ideally, there’s no need to have such an elaborate solution if the hiring manager did everything from writing the job description, determining and communicating the selection criteria to conducting the interviews. Practically as we have learned, only 50% of the hiring managers write the job descriptions. Only 64% of them are engaged in determining and communicating the selection criteria and most of the interviews are conducted by interviewers who are not the hiring managers. Hence the need to have a solution that facilitates collaboration and communication.

Continue reading “IT Hiring as Seen by Interviewers/Hiring Managers: Part 2”

IT Hiring as Seen by Interviewers and Hiring Managers: Part 1

In a recent survey conducted by the author, the majority of the interviewers said that the hiring process was wasting a lot of their time. More than 20% felt the need to complain as they could use that time for more important project-related work. About 50% didn’t complain, although they felt that their time was being wasted.

Continue reading “IT Hiring as Seen by Interviewers and Hiring Managers: Part 1”

There’s an Elephant in the Room – Let’s Build a Pragmatic, Objective & Transparent Compensation Policy! PART 2/2


As stated in part 1, this is an experience report from the author’s company where a more pragmatic, objective and transparent model is being used to determine compensation. For most skills having a sufficient number of jobs and job-seekers, a market mechanism becomes operational. Ruling market rates are the most impartial and objective way to determine compensation.

Continue reading “There’s an Elephant in the Room – Let’s Build a Pragmatic, Objective & Transparent Compensation Policy! PART 2/2”

There’s an Elephant in the Room – We can’t Ignore Employee Compensation! PART 1/2


It’s more than obvious to all of us that compensation plays a major part in employees’ level of motivation. Well paid employees will try to do even better as they see their efforts getting rewarded. Employees treat customers, vendors, investors the way they are treated by the company. Well paid employees go out of their way to please the partners in your company’s progress. Poorly paid employees tend to be insensitive to the problems faced by customers, vendors, investors and even other employees.

Continue reading “There’s an Elephant in the Room – We can’t Ignore Employee Compensation! PART 1/2”

Does Winner Take All in the Tech Resume Sourcing Game?


“ I don’t really search for a job. All I do is to update my profile on Naukri and I wait for the calls – and believe me, I get more calls than I need” – A Developer with 4 years experience.

There are several job boards or web-sites where companies can post the open positions. But candidates – particularly the good ones don’t really “search” – they passively wait to be found by a recruiter. So it can be safely concluded that a developer or a tester with less than 10 years experience would default to this model. I thought that “Naukri” is where most recruiters would go to search for prospective candidates.

To learn the recruiters’ story ; I conducted a survey. Here are some insights based on the responses received from 36 IT recruiters.

Continue reading “Does Winner Take All in the Tech Resume Sourcing Game?”